Mandatory Cybersecurity Audits for Indian Crypto Exchanges: A CyberDudeBivash Report By CyberDudeBivash — Crypto Security, Regulatory Intelligence & Threat Defense

-

 


cyberdudebivash.com | cyberbivash.blogspot.com | cryptobivash.code.blog

 Background & What Changed

  • On September 2025, the Government of India mandated cybersecurity audits for all cryptocurrency exchanges, custodians, and intermediaries, in response to a surge in cyber thefts in the sector. The Economic Times+1

  • These audits must be conducted by security auditors registered with CERT-In, India’s nodal cybersecurity agency. Business Standard

  • The directive came from FIU-India (Financial Intelligence Unit) via a letter dated 15 September, and affects Virtual Digital Asset (VDA) service providers. Business Standard

 Why This Move Matters

  • Security gap response: Acknowledges that many exchanges have had weak security postures — frequent hacks, internal thefts etc.

  • Trust & investor protection: Helps protect users’ funds by ensuring platforms adhere to minimum cybersecurity standards.

  • Regulatory alignment: Exchanges are already under AML/KYC/ FIU obligations; this adds cyber-resilience as another compliance pillar.

  • Standardization: Having CERT-In-approved auditors and baseline guidelines ensures audits are meaningful, not just procedural.

 BASIS: CERT-In Guidelines & Standards

  • CERT-In recently issued Comprehensive Cyber Security Audit Policy Guidelines which require that audits cover:

    • Vulnerability assessments & penetration testing

    • Network security, cloud security, application security

    • Secure code review, APIs, third-party dependencies

    • Incident response readiness, data handling, and log management, etc. azb

  • These guidelines also require audits at least annually, with higher frequency depending on risk level, criticality of assets, or sectoral regulation. azb

 What Crypto Exchanges Need to Audit & Be Audited On

Here are the core domains for audit under this mandate—based on CERT-In’s guidelines and the specific risks in crypto exchanges:

Audit DomainKey Focus Areas
Identity & Access Management (IAM)Who has privileged access (admins, devops, custodians), how are credentials stored, use of MFA / hardware keys, least privilege principle.
Authentication & Authorization FlawsRole-based access control, broken auth APIs, service accounts, session management.
Network & Infrastructure SecurityExposed endpoints, network segmentation, firewall rules, Forensic logging, cloud infrastructure misconfigurations.
Application & Smart Contract SecurityCode vulnerabilities, web app / API security, smart contract audit if applicable.
Third-party and Dependency RisksLibraries, SDKs, providers, SDK versions, libraries used in wallets / UI / backend.
Incident Response & LoggingLog collection, retention, alerting, ability to respond to incidents quickly.
Data Protection & EncryptionHow customer data is stored, encrypted, in transit; policies for cryptography in wallet/custody.
Cyber Risk & Business ContinuityDisaster recovery, backup integrity, business continuity plans.

 Key Challenges & Risks Ahead

  • Scope creep: Exchanges may not know all their risk areas (e.g., smart contract risks, DeFi integrations, cross-chain bridges).

  • Cost & resource burden: Smaller exchanges may struggle with costs of thorough audits and ongoing compliance.

  • False compliance: Audits may be superficial unless auditor independence and technical credentials are good.

  • Lag in enforcement: Without strong regulatory enforcement, some may delay or under-report.

  • Transparency & public trust: Users must be able to see audit compliance status (maybe via disclosures) to differentiate trustworthy platforms.

 What Good Audit Looks Like — Best Practices

To meet BOTH regulatory compliance and genuine security, exchanges should follow these best practices:

  1. Choose a CERT-In-approved Auditor

    • Confirm empanelment status, technical team credentials, prior experience with crypto.

  2. Define Scope Broadly & Tailored to Crypto

    • Include smart contracts / blockchain nodes.

    • Include custodial wallet infrastructure.

    • Include bridges, oracle services, hot/cold wallets.

  3. Use Industry Benchmarks & Standards

    • OWASP ASVS / API Security standards.

    • Blockchain smart contract security best practices (formal verification if possible).

    • Incident Response frameworks (CERT-In, NIST, etc.).

  4. Frequency & Triggered Audits

    • Annual full audit.

    • Additional audits after any major change: redesign, major upgrade, adding new wallet type, integrating new chains.

  5. Transparency & Remediation Tracking

    • Publish audit executive summary (not necessarily everything, but high-level).

    • Track remediation of vulnerabilities, disclose timelines.

  6. Continuous Monitoring

    • Not just audit and forget. Use monitoring tools: WAFs, anomaly detection, bug bounty programs, real-time threat intelligence.

 Compliance & Enforcement: What Has Been Announced

  • Exchanges must engage security auditors empaneled by CERT-In. Business Standard+1

  • FIU letter directs that designated directors, principal officers, and CCOs of VDA platforms comply immediately. Business Standard

  • CERT-In’s guidelines allow for consequences for non-compliance (audit failures, deficiencies), though regulatory enforcement details are still evolving. azb

 Detection & Audit Readiness Checklist (For Exchanges)

Here’s a checklist to verify readiness, spot gaps, and prepare for audits or regulatory review:

  •  All privileged accounts use MFA / hardware keys.

  •  Inventory of all external / internal dependencies and SDKs.

  •  Regular pentesting and code review of all APIs and smart contracts.

  •  Secure wallet infrastructure: separation between hot wallet / cold wallet, limited signing paths.

  •  Strong logging and alerting, with logs retained per CERT-In / FIU / RBI (if applicable) guidelines.

  •  Network segmentation: custody systems isolated, internal management API access restricted.

  •  Incident response plan in place with drills.

  •  Transparency in disclosure: users informed of audit compliance status.

 What Investors & Users Should Expect

  • Exchanges should publish whether they have completed CERT-In audits, and summary findings.

  • Users should prefer platforms with independent audits and strong security disclosures.

  • Be wary of platforms that are silent on audits, or use vague language.

 Broader Context & The CyberDudeBivash View

  • This is a big step for Indian crypto regulation, aligning it with global best practices.

  • India is moving from purely financial regulation (KYC/AML) to cyber regulation / technology risk governance.

  • Crypto exchanges are now being treated as critical digital financial infrastructure from a cyber standpoint.

 CyberDudeBivash Recommendations & Services

If you are a crypto platform in India or an investor:

  • We provide Audit Readiness Assessments for crypto exchanges: gap analysis vs CERT-In guidelines & threat modeling.

  • We offer packaged Incident Response Plans & “What to do after audit fail” playbooks.

  • We maintain Crypto Exchange Security Certification consulting, helping platforms meet rigorous audit criteria.

  • We deliver user-educational content so investors understand audit disclosures and risk signals.

Contact: iambivash@cyberdudebivash.com


#CyberDudeBivash #CryptoRegulationIndia #CERTIn #CryptoSecurityAudit #ExchangeCybersecurity #VDACompliance #CryptoInvestorProtection #AuditStandardsIndia #CyberResilience #DigitalAssetsSecurity

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CyberDudeBivash Rapid Advisory — WordPress Plugin: Social-Login Authentication Bypass (Threat Summary & Emergency Playbook)

-
Image
  TL;DR: A class of vulnerabilities in WordPress social-login / OAuth plugins can let attackers bypass normal authentication flows and obtain an administrative session (or create admin users) by manipulating OAuth callback parameters, reusing stale tokens, or exploiting improper validation of the identity assertions returned by providers. If you run a site that accepts social logins (Google, Facebook, Apple, GitHub, etc.), treat this as high priority : audit, patch, or temporarily disable social login until you confirm your plugin is safe. This advisory gives you immediate actions, detection steps, mitigation, and recovery guidance. Why this matters (short) Social-login plugins often accept externally-issued assertions (OAuth ID tokens, authorization codes, user info). If the plugin fails to validate provider signatures, nonce/state values, redirect URIs, or maps identities to local accounts incorrectly , attackers can craft requests that the site accepts as authenticated. ...
Read more

Hackers Injecting Malicious Code into GitHub Actions to Steal PyPI Tokens CyberDudeBivash — Threat Brief & Defensive Playbook

-
Image
  SUMMARY  Attackers are modifying GitHub Actions workflows (via compromised accounts, malicious PRs, or forged commits) to add steps that exfiltrate PyPI (or other package registry) publishing tokens. With those tokens they publish backdoored packages or download private packages — a supply-chain multiplier. Defend by eliminating long-lived secrets, switching to OIDC/ephemeral credentials, hardening workflow controls, monitoring workflow changes and secret usage, and rotating tokens immediately if you suspect compromise. How attackers typically operate  Gain write access to repo or CI/CD config (via compromised developer account, stolen token, privilege abuse, or merge of malicious PR). Modify or add a workflow file that runs in the repo’s runner context (self-hosted or GitHub-hosted). Add steps that read repository secrets (e.g., PYPI_TOKEN ) or create credentials files ( ~/.pypirc ), then send the token to attacker-controlled endpoints or push a malicious p...
Read more

Exchange Hybrid Warning: CVE-2025-53786 can cascade into domain compromise (on-prem ↔ M365) By CyberDudeBivash — Cybersecurity & AI

-
Image
  Executive summary CVE-2025-53786 is a post-authentication elevation of privilege in Microsoft Exchange hybrid deployments . If an attacker first gains admin on an on-prem Exchange server , they can abuse the legacy “shared service principal” trust used by Hybrid Configuration to escalate into Exchange Online —potentially leading to full cloud+on-prem domain compromise . CISA issued Emergency Directive ED-25-02 with a deadline of 9:00 a.m. EDT on August 11, 2025 for U.S. federal agencies; Microsoft urges all hybrid customers to take the same steps: apply the April 2025 Hotfix Updates , migrate to the dedicated Exchange Hybrid app , and reset/clean up service principal credentials . cisa.gov +1 TECHCOMMUNITY.MICROSOFT.COM +1 Why this is dangerous: actions initiated from the on-prem Exchange side may not show up as obviously malicious in M365 audit trails, making cloud abuse harder to spot if you’ve not modernized the trust. TechRadar What is actually vulnerable? (trust...
Read more